🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 572+ reviews
Vintage āœ“ In Stock šŸ”„ Bestseller

Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock

ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜… 4.6 out of 5 (572 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$20
$33.33
Sale
āœ“ no-cost shipment on this item • Limited time offer

Vintage Semca wind up travel alarm Clark. Unsure if keeps accurate time, but cute vintage display piece

šŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy Shipping
ā†©ļø
elementary Returns

šŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock

Vintage Semca wind up travel alarm Clark. Unsure if keeps accurate time, but cute vintage display piece

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

šŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 605152

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Clocks

Original Price: $33.33 USD

Sale Price: $20 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 shipment & Returns

āœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Based on 572 reviews
KC
Kayla Campbell āœ“ Verified
1 month ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
extraordinary Quality
After a few days, the Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock works fine which feels reasonable. Works fine so far.
MK
Megan King āœ“ Verified
1 month ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
terrific Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock!
After a few days, the Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock feels solid and it meets expectations.
AC
Amber Carter āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
adore this Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock!
So far, it is practical which feels reasonable.
DC
Daniel Clark āœ“ Verified
1 month ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Exactly What I Needed
respectable and good price Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock.
JM
Jessica Moore āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
ultimate Purchase Ever
At first, the Vintage Semca Wind Up Travel Alarm Clock works fine so I’m okay with it. Works fine so far.